Simulasi Disturbance Observer pada Sistem Kendali Aliran Cairan Berbasis Mikrokontroler
Abstract
This research discusses the design and implementation of a PID controller-based liquid flow control system equipped with a Disturbance Observer (DOB). The system is designed to compensate for the influence of external disturbances that can interfere with control performance. The design process starts with modeling the system dynamics using mathematical equations, followed by designing a PID controller to regulate the flow according to the desired setpoint. The DOB is designed by utilizing the inverse model of the system to estimate the disturbances that occur and compensate for their effects on the control signals in real-time. Simulations were conducted to compare the performance of the system with and without DOB in the face of disturbances. The results show that the system with DOB has better performance, with more stable response, faster recovery time, and smaller steady-state error than the system without DOB. This confirms the effectiveness of DOB in improving the robustness of the control system against external disturbances.
References
[2] E. Sariyildiz, H. Yu, and K. Ohnishi, “A Practical Tuning Method for the Robust PID Controller with Velocity Feed-Back,” Machines, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 208–222, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.3390/machines3030208.
[3] W.-H. Chen, J. Yang, L. Guo, and S. Li, “Disturbance-Observer-Based Control and Related Methods—An Overview,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 1083–1095, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2478397.
[4] E. Sariyildiz and K. Ohnishi, “A Guide to Design Disturbance Observer,” J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, vol. 136, no. 2, p. 021011, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1115/1.4025801.
[5] P. Keadtipod, D. Banjerdpongchai, and P. Kittisupakorn, “Design of Disturbance Observer and Model Predictive Control for Non-Minimum Phase Time-Delay System With Application to Industrial Boilers,” in 2017 56th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), Kanazawa: IEEE, Sep. 2017, pp. 1389–1394. doi: 10.23919/SICE.2017.8105733.
[6] B. B. Alagoz, F. N. Deniz, C. Keles, and N. Tan, “Disturbance Rejection Performance Analyses of Closed Loop Control Systems by Reference to Disturbance Ratio,” ISA Trans., vol. 55, pp. 63–71, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.09.013.
[7] R. Garrido and J. L. Luna, “On the Equivalence Between PD+DOB and PID Controllers Applied to Servo Drives,” IFAC-Pap., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 95–100, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.044.
[8] B. S. Marta, I. Ferdiansyah, and F. Ardila, “Sistem Kendali Kecepatan Motor Pada Mobile Robot Menggunakan PID Dan Analisis Disturbance Berbasis Disturbance Observer,” JTT J. Teknol. Terpadu, vol. 6, no. 2, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.32487/jtt.v6i2.461.
[9] D. I. Saputra, I. Budiawan, and A. Jayanugraha, “Pemodelan dan Simulasi Sistem Kendali Volume Air Pada Process Plant Dengan Metode State Feedback,” J. Otomasi Kontrol Dan Instrumentasi, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2022, doi: 10.5614/joki.2022.14.1.2.
[10] N. Saikumar, R. K. Sinha, and S. H. HosseinNia, “Resetting Disturbance Observers With Application in Compensation of Bounded Nonlinearities Like Hysteresis in Piezo-Actuators,” Control Eng. Pract., vol. 82, pp. 36–49, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.09.026.